FREE CASE EVALUATION: +1-888-885-2771                                          Email us:


Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder controversy may end soon. Get lawyer.

Alex Gorsky, chief executive of Johnson & Johnson, is interrogated in Middlesex County Superior Court in New Brunswick, New Jersey on January. 27 January, 2020. The health product giant has had to defend itself against many lawsuits alleging that asbestos-contaminated personal hygiene products made of talc cause cancer. The company has always denied that its products contain asbestos or can cause cancer. Photographer: Lucas Jackson/Reuters


The company proposes the $8.9 billion settlement for cancer-related claims and has decided to end its talc-based products. However, the seeds for legal action, Bloomberg Investigates revealed, were planted years back.

Johnson’s infant powder for a long time been a cult product. However, the product has recently caused a furor about the company. A plethora of lawsuits were brought by Johnson & Johnson alleging the talc-based version was contaminated by asbestos that causes cancer.

Plaintiffs argue that internal documents indicate that the company was aware of the health risks it posed for years. The company claims it was aware that its product, which it is removing this year, had asbestos in it or that causes cancer. The company also points to its numerous legal victories and dismissals of cases.

J&J Failed Strategy?

Johnson & Johnson’s plan to utilize bankruptcy to resolve the multibillion-dollar lawsuit concerning claims that its products containing talc can cause cancer was denied by an appeals court of the Federal Circuit on Monday. The company’s healthcare division said it will appeal the decision.

The ruling of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia lifted from bankruptcy its LTL Management unit, which was settling over 38,000-plus legal charges related to its products, such as Johnson’s Baby Powder.

J&J shares fell 2.7 per cent in trading at midday in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

J&J, which maintains that its talc products are safe, created the company and then spun it off LTL and transferred its talc liability to the company and bankrupted it in 2021.

J&J claimed bankruptcy could be a means to settle thousands of legal cases faster and more effectively instead of bringing each case to trial separately. The company also pledged a financial “backstop” to ensure LTL could pay claimants for talc.

The court of appeals ruled that it could not decide on the LTL Chapter 11 petition because it was created only to gain access to banks for bankruptcy and not because it was financially stressed.

“Applied here, while LTL faces substantial future talc liability, its funding backstop mitigates any financial distress foreseen on its petition date,” was the opinion of 56 pages of three judges.

J&J announced that it would challenge the ruling of the Third Circuit and will continue to pursue an end to the bankruptcy court lawsuits.

“As we have said from the beginning of this process, resolving this matter as quickly and efficiently as possible is in the best interests of claimants and all stakeholders,” J&J spokeswoman Allison Fennell said. “We continue to stand behind the safety of Johnson’s Baby Powder, which is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer.”

Texas two-step Strategy

J&J utilized a restructuring method called “Texas two-step” which was condemned by academics and lawmakers who suggested that the strategy could be a model for other companies looking to stay clear of juries in mass tort suits.


Before the bankruptcy filing, J&J faced costs from $3.5 billion in settlements and verdicts before the bankruptcy filing, among them a case in which 23 women received a settlement worth over $2 billion, according to the bankruptcy court records.


More than 1,500 lawsuits were dismissed without J&J needing to pay anything, and the vast majority of cases that went to trial resulted in mistrials, defence verdicts or judgements against J&J on appeal in LTL’s court documents.

An appeals court asked to reject the bankruptcy petition of plaintiffs suing over products made of talc. They argued that one of the largest health companies should be unable to use bankruptcy to shield it from lawsuits.


The cancer patients sought an appeals court’s permission to overrule a New Jersey bankruptcy judge who had permitted LTL’s bankruptcy to go on. LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented lawsuits from pursuing against it. US Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan in Trenton, NJ, ruled in February that the bankruptcy of LTL must also prevent any lawsuits involving talc from being filed against the parent J&J. J&J.

Kaplan stated that The bankruptcy court was better able to deal with mass tort litigation than other courts.


If you or your loved ones  has a history of using J&J Talcum and they are diagnosed by cancer or any major health condition, We can still help you. Feel free to take your case evaluation – at no cost. Our Lawsuit expert will study your case and help you get compensation, If you qualify. 

One reply on “Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder controversy may end soon. Get lawyer.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Your Free

Case Evaluation!

The fee is free, you only pay when you win!

Recent News


Sharing is caring.. ?


Get Your compensation now, before it gets too late

The fee is free, you only pay when you win. Get Free Consultation from our expert lawyers.

The Justice Now Legal News

The biggest loser — workers’ compensation?

When you see a person you’ve not seen for several months, You’re probably to ask: “Gee, you look great. Have you lost weight?” The most likely answer is Ozempic Wegovy and Mounjaro. Ozempic, as well as Mounjaro, were designed for treating Type 2 diabetes; Wegovy explicitly intended to be a weight-loss drug, making use of the same semaglutide formulation used in Ozempic.

The Justice Now Legal News

Doctor asks court to toss J&J lawsuit against her over cancer research

A medical scientist has asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit Johnson & Johnson brought against her for her 2019 research on the link between cosmetic talc and cancer. She argued that her work is reliable and is protected by the freedom of speech rights.

The Justice Now Legal News

Appeals court OKs ‘common benefit’ fees in Bard IVC filter litigation. Next stop the Supreme Court?

Appeals court OKs ‘common benefit’ fees in Bard IVC filter litigation. Next stop the Supreme Court? – Lawyers representing plaintiffs who have signed agreements to pay a portion of their fee to chiefs of significant multidistrict litigation have to respect those agreements even if they decide to settle disputes outside the process, as per a federal appeals court ruling that week.

The Justice Now Legal News

Navy, Justice Dept. offer payouts in bid to speed up Camp Lejeune claims

The United States Department of Justice and U.S. Navy announced a program of tier-based payouts to those whom the water contamination on Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune has harmed.

Ozempic Lawsuit

Ozempic Lawsuit: What you need to know

Ozempic Lawsuit: What you need to know – Ozempic (semaglutide) is an injection of 0.5- 2 mg, an injectable prescribed medicine used by type 2 – diabetic patients to lower the risk of heart attack, stroke, or death. Also, some of them are used for weight loss.

Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit

All You Need to Know About Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit: Latest Updates 2023 and Eligibility Criteria

Bard Powerport Catheter Lawsuit Updates 2023

You might also like...

One reply on “Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder controversy may end soon. Get lawyer.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free Consultation?

Fill out your details and we will get back to you as soon as possible.