FREE CASE EVALUATION: +1-888-885-2771                                          Email us: contact@thejusticenow.com

Doctor asks court to toss J&J lawsuit against her over cancer research

A medical scientist has asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit Johnson & Johnson brought against her for her 2019 research on the link between cosmetic talc and cancer. She argued that her work is reliable and is protected by the freedom of speech rights.

The Justice Now (Sept 15th): A medical scientist has asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit Johnson & Johnson brought against her for her 2019 research on the link between cosmetic talc and cancer. She argued that her work is reliable and is protected by the freedom of speech rights.

Dr. Jacqueline Moline was an expert witness for plaintiffs in more than 200 lawsuits in which she claimed that J&J products containing talc caused cancer-causing patients. In a court filing filed in the federal courts at Trenton, New Jersey, the lawsuit was an attempt to “intimidate” experts in the field of science.

According to the Moline court filing, Scientific conclusions based on accurate descriptions of data and the methodology used to create them are protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution’s protections for freedom of the speech of academics and free expression.

J&J has been hit with over 38,000 legal cases alleging its talc products, such as Johnson’s Baby Powder, can contain asbestos and cause cancers, including ovarian and mesothelioma.

The company claims that its products made of talc are safe and don’t contain asbestos.

J&J’s affiliate LTL Management, which absorbed the company’s liability for talc in the controversial spinoff in 2021, was sued by Moline in May. The company also sued another three researchers in July. Claiming they were guilty of publishing false research, which damaged J&J’s image.

J&J issued a statement Monday reiterating the lawsuit filed in May that the study conducted by Moline was flawed due to its claim to focus on 33 patients who did not have asbestos exposure other than the use of cosmetic talc. In reality, one participant in the study was exposed to a second source of asbestos. J&J stated that it believes some study participants are exposed to asbestos in other ways.

An attorney representing Moline spoke on Monday only after the documents were submitted to the court.

Moline, who is employed in Northwell Health in Great Neck, New York, said in her court papers that her study correctly disclosed that all data about patients’ exposure to asbestos was derived from the testimony they offered during their cases. The study also revealed the possibility of conflicts of interest arising from her position as an expert witness for plaintiffs.

A patient who had submitted a workers’ compensation claim that seemed to contradict her testimony in court by claiming another source of asbestos exposure, Moline changed her document to note she shouldn’t include that patient; however, she remained with her conclusions, as per her court report.

J&J has been trying to resolve the talc controversy by putting LTL Management in bankruptcy, and as part of the process, offered $8.9 billion to stop any future or ongoing lawsuits in which talc is blamed for causing cancer. The company’s efforts have been blocked by the court’s ruling that the company isn’t in a state of financial crisis to be eligible for bankruptcy protection.

J&J has filed an appeal against the rulings and ramped up attacks on research studies that were used to support litigation involving talc.

The Talc lawsuits have a mixed track record in court as well, with J&J having won several cases while losing some, including the $2.1 billion judgement that was awarded to the 22 plaintiffs who blamed cancer of the ovary due to asbestos contained in the talc products of the company. The lawsuits had been put on hold because of the company’s bankruptcy. However, they can restart after the default has been thrown out.

J&J has discontinued selling talc-based Baby Powder in favour of cornstarch-based products. The reason is an increase in lawsuits and “misinformation” regarding the safety of the talc-based product.

If you or someone close to you has ever used Johnsons & Johnsons Talcum Powder and has experienced health issues then you are eligible, you could be able to file a case and get your due compensation.

To schedule a free case evaluation, contact us now. We’ll be happy with any queries you may have and assist you in getting the justice you deserve.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Your Free

Case Evaluation!

The fee is free, you only pay when you win!

Recent News

Categories

Sharing is caring.. ?

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit
WhatsApp
Email
Telegram
the-justice-now

Get Your compensation now, before it gets too late

The fee is free, you only pay when you win. Get Free Consultation from our expert lawyers.

The Justice Now Legal News

The biggest loser — workers’ compensation?

When you see a person you’ve not seen for several months, You’re probably to ask: “Gee, you look great. Have you lost weight?” The most likely answer is Ozempic Wegovy and Mounjaro. Ozempic, as well as Mounjaro, were designed for treating Type 2 diabetes; Wegovy explicitly intended to be a weight-loss drug, making use of the same semaglutide formulation used in Ozempic.

The Justice Now Legal News

Doctor asks court to toss J&J lawsuit against her over cancer research

A medical scientist has asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit Johnson & Johnson brought against her for her 2019 research on the link between cosmetic talc and cancer. She argued that her work is reliable and is protected by the freedom of speech rights.

IVC-Filter-litigation
The Justice Now Legal News

Appeals court OKs ‘common benefit’ fees in Bard IVC filter litigation. Next stop the Supreme Court?

Appeals court OKs ‘common benefit’ fees in Bard IVC filter litigation. Next stop the Supreme Court? – Lawyers representing plaintiffs who have signed agreements to pay a portion of their fee to chiefs of significant multidistrict litigation have to respect those agreements even if they decide to settle disputes outside the process, as per a federal appeals court ruling that week.

The Justice Now Legal News

Navy, Justice Dept. offer payouts in bid to speed up Camp Lejeune claims

The United States Department of Justice and U.S. Navy announced a program of tier-based payouts to those whom the water contamination on Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune has harmed.

Ozempic Lawsuit

Ozempic Lawsuit: What you need to know

Ozempic Lawsuit: What you need to know – Ozempic (semaglutide) is an injection of 0.5- 2 mg, an injectable prescribed medicine used by type 2 – diabetic patients to lower the risk of heart attack, stroke, or death. Also, some of them are used for weight loss.

Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit

All You Need to Know About Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit: Latest Updates 2023 and Eligibility Criteria

Bard Powerport Catheter Lawsuit Updates 2023

You might also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free Consultation?

Fill out your details and we will get back to you as soon as possible.